This tool calculates the actual value of CHY tokens based on current market conditions. The CHY airdrop promises 400,000 tokens per winner, but these tokens have no market value. Calculate what you're really getting.
There’s a new airdrop popping up on CoinMarketCap called CHY from Concern Poverty Chain. It promises to give away 800 million tokens to 2,000 lucky winners - up to 400,000 CHY each. Sounds like free money, right? But here’s the catch: as of today, CHY is worth exactly $0. No one is buying it. No one is selling it. Not on Binance. Not on WEEX. Not anywhere. The token doesn’t trade. It doesn’t move. And yet, people are still signing up.
So why does this exist? And should you bother?
Concern Poverty Chain says it’s a global humanitarian project built on blockchain to make charity transparent. The idea is simple: when you donate, the blockchain tracks every dollar. No middlemen. No corruption. Just direct help to people in need. That’s a powerful vision. But vision doesn’t pay bills. And right now, CHY doesn’t even have a market price.
If you want to join, here’s what you need to do:
That’s it. Five minutes of your time. No wallet needed. No deposit. No risk - except the risk of wasting your attention.
This is standard airdrop behavior. Projects do this to build hype, grow followers, and create the illusion of demand. But most successful airdrops lead to real tokens with real use cases. CHY doesn’t have either.
The CHY token contract address is 0x35a2...030971 on Ethereum. You can check it on Etherscan. But here’s what you’ll find:
That’s not a glitch. That’s the reality. No one owns CHY. No one trades it. No exchange lists it for buying or selling. Even the price converters show "1 USD = ∞ CHY" - because if something is worth nothing, you need infinite units to equal one dollar.
There’s an old CHY token from 2021. Etherscan shows a past airdrop. That one also died. This feels like a reboot - same name, same mission, same empty wallet.
No team members are listed. No whitepaper with technical details. No roadmap. No updates since the airdrop announcement. No press releases. No interviews. No charity reports. No photos of communities helped. No bank statements showing donations sent.
Compare that to projects like GiveCrypto or BitGive. They’ve sent actual crypto to people in need - verified transactions, real stories, public ledgers. They don’t need to promise airdrops because they’re already doing the work.
Concern Poverty Chain has none of that. Just a Twitter account with 3,000 followers, a Telegram group with maybe 500 members, and a CoinMarketCap page that looks professional but says nothing real.
It’s not that airdrops are bad. Many legitimate projects use them to reward early supporters. But CHY is different. It’s selling hope without substance.
People in poverty don’t need more tokens. They need food, clean water, medicine, and education. If you’re donating to a blockchain charity, you should be able to see where your money went. You should be able to track a donation from your wallet to a child’s meal.
CHY can’t do that. Because it doesn’t have any donations to track.
And if you participate in this airdrop, you’re not helping anyone. You’re just giving free attention to a project that’s trying to look real. That attention can be monetized later - maybe by selling fake NFTs, launching a paid subscription, or even running a pump-and-dump scheme once they get enough users.
If you win the airdrop, you’ll get 400,000 CHY tokens in your CoinMarketCap wallet. But you can’t move them. You can’t swap them. You can’t cash them out. You can’t even send them to another wallet. They’re locked in a watchlist - a digital trophy with no value.
Think of it like winning a free ticket to a concert that was canceled. You have the ticket. But the show never happened.
Some people will say, "What if it becomes valuable later?" That’s the gamble. But here’s the truth: tokens that start at $0 and have zero utility almost never become valuable. They become ghosts.
There are hundreds of crypto projects that promise to save the world. Most fail. The ones that succeed don’t rely on airdrops. They rely on results.
If you care about using blockchain for good, here are better options:
These projects have public ledgers. They publish receipts. They show you who got help and how much. They don’t need to give away tokens to prove they’re real.
Want to support poverty relief? Give directly. Or if you want to use crypto, pick a project that’s already doing the work - not one that’s just asking you to follow a Twitter account.
This airdrop isn’t an anomaly. It’s part of a growing trend: using humanitarian language to mask empty crypto schemes. "Blockchain for good" sounds noble. But without accountability, it’s just marketing.
Real change doesn’t need a token. It needs action. It needs transparency. It needs proof.
CHY doesn’t have any of that. And until it does, it’s just noise.
Participating won’t hurt you - you’re not spending money. But you’re giving your time and trust to something that doesn’t deserve it. And in a world where real people are suffering, that’s the real cost.
Leo Lanham
7 11 25 / 02:53 AMThis is the exact kind of scam that makes me want to delete my crypto wallet forever. You think you’re getting free money, but you’re just feeding attention to a ghost. People are literally signing up for nothing. It’s sad. And hilarious. And terrifying.
Brian Webb
8 11 25 / 00:50 AMI get why people do this. Hope is cheap. Attention is free. But when you’re talking about poverty relief, even fake hope feels like a betrayal. I didn’t click the link. I just scrolled past. Sometimes doing nothing is the most ethical choice.
Whitney Fleras
9 11 25 / 17:12 PMHonestly? I read the whole thing. I didn’t sign up. But I didn’t feel angry either. Just... tired. Like we’ve seen this movie before. And the ending never changes.
Colin Byrne
11 11 25 / 04:56 AMOne must consider the epistemological implications of tokenized altruism. If value is derived solely from perceived utility, and utility is absent, then the token becomes a semiotic void - a linguistic artifact masquerading as economic instrument. The blockchain, in this context, functions not as a ledger of transactions, but as a mirror of collective delusion. The fact that CoinMarketCap hosts this project speaks volumes about the commodification of moral sentiment in late-stage capitalism. One cannot help but wonder: are we being manipulated, or are we willingly complicit?
Anthony Allen
11 11 25 / 17:36 PMMan, I live in the US but I’ve got family in Nigeria. I’ve seen real crypto donations help. Not tokens. Actual ETH sent to buy food. This CHY thing? It’s just noise. Skip it. Go donate to UNICEF’s crypto fund. They even send you receipts.
Robert Bailey
12 11 25 / 04:43 AMFree stuff is free stuff right? But yeah this feels like collecting empty candy wrappers. I did it once for a real airdrop and got $500 worth of tokens. This? Nah. I’m out.
Wendy Pickard
14 11 25 / 03:03 AMI checked the contract address. Zero circulating supply. Zero volume. Zero chance. I’m not mad. Just disappointed. We used to be better than this.
Natalie Nanee
15 11 25 / 16:21 PMThis is why crypto is a cult. People will believe anything if it’s wrapped in ‘saving the world’ language. You’re not helping the poor. You’re helping the scammers get richer. Wake up.
Angie McRoberts
17 11 25 / 06:02 AMSo... you’re telling me the only thing I get is a notification on CoinMarketCap? Like a digital sticker? Cool. I’ll pass. I’ve got better things to do with my attention than decorate someone’s vanity metrics.
Chris Hollis
17 11 25 / 12:07 PM0 value. 0 trading. 0 team. 0 proof. 0 reason to care. Why are we even talking about this?
Angie Martin-Schwarze
19 11 25 / 10:30 AMi just signed up because i was bored and now i feel guilty like i helped a scammer? i hate this feeling. why does everything have to be so fake? i just wanna help someone and now i dont even know how anymore
Janna Preston
20 11 25 / 19:21 PMWait, so if you win, do the tokens go to your wallet? Or just show up on CoinMarketCap? I’m confused. Is it like a badge or something?
Meagan Wristen
21 11 25 / 04:30 AMThank you for writing this. I’ve been seeing so many people excited about this and I didn’t know how to explain why it felt wrong. You nailed it. Real change doesn’t need a token. It needs a receipt.
Becca Robins
22 11 25 / 17:25 PMso like... if i get 400k chy... can i use it to buy coffee? 🤔 maybe if i tweet enough it’ll be worth 1 cent? lol jk... unless?
Alexa Huffman
23 11 25 / 19:50 PMThe structural integrity of this project is nonexistent. No team, no whitepaper, no transaction history, no verified partnerships. The absence of these elements isn’t an oversight - it’s the design. This isn’t a charity. It’s a performance.
Matthew Gonzalez
23 11 25 / 19:57 PMWhat’s more dangerous - the scam, or the fact that we’ve trained ourselves to believe that hope can be tokenized? That if we just follow, retweet, and join a Telegram group, we’ve done our part? We’ve outsourced compassion to a checklist. And now we feel virtuous for doing nothing.
Alexis Rivera
25 11 25 / 16:36 PMI used to think blockchain could fix charity. Then I saw projects like GiveCrypto actually do it - real people, real receipts, real impact. CHY? It’s just a digital ghost story. Don’t ghost your conscience. Skip it.
John Doe
26 11 25 / 01:07 AMWhat if this is a government psyop? They want us to sign up so they can track who’s interested in crypto charity. Then they use it to target us with ads or worse. I’m not clicking anything. This is too clean. Too perfect. Something’s off.