JulSwap Crypto Exchange Review: Is This Decentralized Exchange Still Worth Using in 2025?

• DATE: 23 09 25
• BY: Stellan Marwick

JulSwap was once a quiet contender in the decentralized exchange space, promising tools that let traders manage portfolios and analyze markets without leaving their wallets. But today, it’s a shadow of what it aimed to be. If you’re wondering whether JulSwap is still worth using in late 2025, the answer isn’t complicated: JulSwap is fading fast, and for good reasons.

What JulSwap Actually Is

JulSwap is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on Ethereum, using the automated market maker (AMM) model. That means there’s no order book-trades happen directly between users and liquidity pools. You connect your wallet-MetaMask, WalletConnect, Ledger, or others-and swap tokens instantly. No KYC, no sign-up, no middleman. Sounds familiar? That’s because it works like Uniswap or PancakeSwap.

Its native token, JULD, was meant to be the engine of the platform. Users earned JULD rewards from trading fees, and liquidity providers got extra incentives. But here’s the problem: the rewards are barely noticeable. Right now, JULD trades at around $0.0014, with a circulating supply of nearly 800 million tokens. That’s a massive supply for almost no demand.

Trading Volume? Almost Gone

JulSwap used to process over $5 million in trades per day in early 2023. Today? It’s lucky to hit $1.2 million. That’s a 78% drop. Compare that to PancakeSwap, which moves over $40 billion daily. JulSwap’s volume is 0.003% of that. It’s not just slow-it’s barely alive.

Why does volume matter? Because low volume means shallow liquidity. Think of liquidity like water in a swimming pool. If the pool is half-empty, any big swimmer (a large trade) creates big ripples-slippage. On JulSwap, slippage on trades over $5,000 often hits 15% or more. That means if you want to swap $5,000 worth of ETH for USDC, you might end up getting 15% less than you expected. That’s not trading-it’s gambling.

For small trades under $500, slippage stays under 1.2%. So if you’re just moving pocket change, JulSwap might work. But if you’re serious about DeFi, you’re setting yourself up for losses.

Liquidity Pools Are Barely There

Here’s the real killer: average liquidity per trading pair on JulSwap is just $18,450. For context, Uniswap averages $1.2 million per pair. PancakeSwap? $750,000. That’s not a small difference-it’s a chasm.

What does this mean for you? If you try to add liquidity to a JulSwap pool, you’re putting your money into a nearly empty bucket. And when the pool is shallow, impermanent loss hits harder. One Trustpilot user reported losing 83% of their initial investment in the ETH/JUL pool. That’s not a risk-it’s a trap.

And the APY? JulSwap’s liquidity pools offer around 0.8% annual yield. Meanwhile, PancakeSwap’s top pools pay over 18%. Why would anyone lock up their crypto here when they can earn 20x more elsewhere?

Wallet Support and Ease of Use

JulSwap does support 15 major wallets, including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and hardware wallets like Ledger. The interface is clean and simple. For beginners, it’s not hard to connect your wallet and click “swap.”

But simplicity doesn’t fix broken mechanics. The real pain points come after the first click:

• Frequent transaction failures during Ethereum network congestion
• Complex token approval steps that confuse new users
• No live chat, no email support-average response time is 72 hours
• Official documentation is poor-only 47% of user questions are answered

Users on SourceForge give it a 2.8/5 rating. The most common complaint? “Shallow liquidity pools.” The second? “Unacceptable slippage.”

Security and Technical Limitations

JulSwap’s smart contracts were audited by CertiK in late 2022. That’s good. But no audit has been done since. In crypto, that’s a red flag. Projects that aren’t updating or re-auditing their code are either stagnant or hiding problems.

Performance is another issue. JulSwap handles only 12 transactions per second. Leading DEXs like Uniswap V3 manage 45-60 TPS. During peak times, JulSwap freezes. Transactions time out. You pay gas fees, and nothing happens.

It’s built on Ethereum, which means high gas costs. There’s no Layer 2 support. No zkEVM. No rollups. Nothing to reduce fees or speed up trades. In 2025, that’s a dealbreaker.

Market Position and Community

JulSwap ranks #147 among all crypto exchanges with a trust score of 3.2/10. The industry average? 7.8/10. It’s not just behind-it’s buried.

Its social presence is almost nonexistent. The official Twitter account posted just 7 times in Q3 2025. The Telegram group has shrunk from 3,892 members to 1,247 in under a year. GitHub hasn’t seen more than 3 code commits in the last 12 months. That’s not development-that’s abandonment.

Industry analysts agree. Michael van de Poppe called JulSwap “a cautionary tale of failed differentiation.” TokenInsight’s Li Chen says it “retains potential,” but there’s zero evidence of any real plan to revive it. No partnerships. No roadmap. No updates since March 2025.

Price Predictions? Don’t Believe the Hype

Some websites claim JULD will hit $0.1571 by the end of 2025. That’s a 128,000% increase. Sounds amazing. But here’s the truth: that prediction has no methodology. It’s pure fantasy.

Other models are more realistic. WalletInvestor predicts JULD will crash to $0.00002-down 98.5%. TradingBeast says it might rise to $0.0018. That’s a 33% gain. Still, even that assumes the token survives.

Here’s what matters: the token’s value is tied to platform usage. No usage? No value. JULD isn’t being burned. It’s not being staked. It’s not being used in any DeFi protocol. It’s just sitting there, a ghost token.

Who Should Use JulSwap?

Only one kind of person should consider JulSwap right now: someone with under $500 to experiment with, who wants to test a DEX interface without risking much. If you’re curious about how AMMs work, and you’re okay with losing a few dollars on slippage, go ahead.

But if you’re looking to trade regularly, provide liquidity, earn rewards, or invest in JULD-don’t. There are dozens of better options.

Alternatives That Actually Work

If you want a DEX that’s alive, here are your real choices:

• Uniswap (Ethereum): Highest liquidity, best slippage control, frequent audits, Layer 2 support.
• PancakeSwap (BSC): Lower fees, higher yields, active community, regular updates.
• Curve Finance: Best for stablecoin swaps, deep pools, low slippage.
• ParaSwap: Aggregator that finds the best price across multiple DEXs-better than JulSwap’s single pool model.

None of these have the same problems JulSwap does. No dead liquidity. No silent teams. No ghost tokens.

Final Verdict

JulSwap is not dead yet-but it’s on life support. The technology isn’t broken. The concept isn’t bad. But the execution is. The team stopped updating. The community vanished. The liquidity dried up. The token lost all purpose.

There’s no sign of a comeback. No roadmap. No partnerships. No news. Just silence.

If you’re thinking of using JulSwap, ask yourself: Why risk your funds on a platform that’s already lost the race? There are dozens of active, well-supported, high-liquidity DEXs out there. You don’t need to settle for a fading ghost.

JulSwap might have had potential. But in 2025, it’s a relic. Walk away.