PumaPay (PMA) was never meant to be just another crypto coin. Launched in May 2018, it promised to fix one of the biggest headaches in cryptocurrency payments: recurring billing. While most crypto payments require you to manually send money each time - like paying for a Netflix subscription with Bitcoin - PumaPay wanted to flip the script. Instead of you pushing funds to a merchant, the merchant could pull payments directly from your wallet, based on rules set in smart contracts. Think of it like automatic bank debits, but on the blockchain.
Everything ran on the Ethereum blockchain. PMA, the native token, was an ERC20 token - meaning it used Ethereum’s existing infrastructure. That made it easy to store in wallets like MetaMask, Trust Wallet, or Noone.io’s own PumaPay Wallet. The system had two main parts: on-chain (the smart contracts) and off-chain (the mobile app and business dashboard). Merchants used the business console to set up billing plans, while users managed their subscriptions and balances through the app.
For these merchants, the appeal was clear: no chargebacks, no intermediaries, and no approval process. The protocol was free to use, and the tools - wallet, SDK, business console - were designed to be plug-and-play. All you needed was an Ethereum-compatible system. No complex API integration. No bank account. Just a smart contract and a wallet.
Why? Three big reasons:
The technical design was clever, but execution was nonexistent. The team, led by Yoav Dror and Aristos Christofides, stopped releasing updates after 2020. No roadmap. No new features. No community engagement. The website became a ghost town. Even the official GitHub repository hasn’t been updated since 2021.
Security-wise, the only advice left is generic: use 2FA, never share your private key, keep your wallet updated. Noone.io’s wallet guide is the last remaining piece of official documentation. There are no forums, no Reddit threads, no Discord communities actively discussing PumaPay. The project is functionally dead.
Compare it to something like Chainlink. Chainlink also started as a niche idea - bringing real-world data to blockchains. But it got real partnerships, real use cases, and real developers. PumaPay had none of that. It was a solution looking for a problem that never showed up.
If you’re looking to invest in crypto payments, look at established players like Polygon, Stellar, or even Bitcoin Lightning Network. They have active development, real merchants, and growing usage. PMA has none of that. It’s a tombstone with a ticker symbol.
Some people buy it hoping for a miracle rebound. But with a 78% annual decline against USD and an 87% drop against Bitcoin over the last year, this isn’t a speculative play - it’s a graveyard.
PumaPay isn’t a coin you hold. It’s a lesson. One that shows how easily crypto projects can vanish - even when they start with solid ideas.
No, PumaPay is not active. The project stopped updating in 2021. The official website is static, the GitHub repo is abandoned, and the development team has not released any new information since 2020. The PMA token still exists on exchanges, but there is no ongoing development, community support, or merchant adoption.
No. Even if you have PMA tokens in your wallet, there are no live merchants using the PumaPay system. The business console, SDK, and payment infrastructure are offline. The protocol’s pull-payment mechanism no longer functions in the real world.
It failed because no one used it. The concept of pull-based crypto payments was innovative, but the team never built trust with users or merchants. They didn’t partner with any real businesses, didn’t market effectively, and didn’t respond to user concerns. Without adoption, even the best technology becomes irrelevant.
The founding team - including CEO Yoav Dror and CTO Aristos Christofides - disappeared from public view after 2020. Their LinkedIn profiles show no recent activity related to PumaPay. No interviews, no blog posts, no conference appearances. The project was effectively abandoned.
No. PMA has lost 99.9% of its value since its peak. Trading volume is near zero, and there is no indication of recovery. Holding PMA is not an investment - it’s a sunk cost. If you own it, consider it a learning experience, not an asset.
Technically yes - you can sell PMA on exchanges like KuCoin or BitMart. But because trading volume is so low, you’ll likely get a terrible price. There’s no liquidity. Selling may take days, and you’ll probably lose most of what’s left in your holdings.
No. PumaPay was always an ERC20 token on the Ethereum blockchain. Although the team mentioned plans to launch its own blockchain in the future, that never happened. All transactions still occur on Ethereum.
PMA can be stored in any Ethereum-compatible wallet that supports ERC20 tokens - like MetaMask, Trust Wallet, or the now-defunct PumaPay Wallet. However, since the project is dead, there’s no official support or updates. Use standard Ethereum wallet security practices: never share your private key, enable 2FA, and keep your recovery phrase offline.
dhirendra pratap singh
12 11 25 / 11:20 AMPumaPay was a dumpster fire wrapped in a whitepaper 🤡 I mean, who lets strangers pull money from their wallet? That’s not innovation, that’s financial Russian roulette. And now it’s worth less than my expired energy drink. RIP, PMA. You had potential, but you were too lazy to even build a Discord server.